lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724233628.GD3641@logfs.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:36:28 -0400
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Dhaval Giani <dgiani@...illa.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, tglek@...illa.com,
	vdjeric@...illa.com, glandium@...illa.com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] ext4: Transparent Decompression Support

On Wed, 24 July 2013 17:03:53 -0400, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> 
> I am posting this series early in its development phase to solicit some
> feedback.

At this state, a good description of the format would be nice.

> We are implementing transparent decompression with a focus on ext4. One
> of the main usecases is that of Firefox on Android. Currently libxul.so
> is compressed and it is loaded into memory by a custom linker on
> demand. With the use of transparent decompression, we can make do
> without the custom linker. More details (i.e. code) about the linker can
> be found at https://github.com/glandium/faulty.lib

It is not quite clear what you want to achieve here.  One approach is
to create an empty file, chattr it to enable compression, then write
uncompressed data to it.  Nothing in userspace will ever know the file
is compressed, unless you explicitly call lsattr.

If you want to follow some other approach where userspace has one
interface to write the compressed data to a file and some other
interface to read the file uncompressed, you are likely in a world of
pain.

Assuming you use the chattr approach, that pretty much comes down to
adding compression support to ext4.  There have been old patches for
ext2 around that never got merged.  Reading up on the problems
encountered by those patches might be instructive.

Jörn

--
I've never met a human being who would want to read 17,000 pages of
documentation, and if there was, I'd kill him to get him out of the
gene pool.
-- Joseph Costello
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ