linux-ext4 - Re: e2fsprogs - possible regression between 1.42.7 and 1.42.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130729160005.GA4676@nik-comp.linuxbox.cz>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:00:05 +0200
From:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e2fsprogs - possible regression between 1.42.7 and 1.42.8

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:40:33AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> What platform are you running this on?  X86?  I generally do a full
> regression test run before I do an e2fsprogs release, so it may very
> well be something which might be platform or compiler specific.

it's x86_64 running kernel 3.0.88-rc1. I also tried x86_64 centos 5, and
different test fails (I was successfully compiling previous releases on those
boxes).

> 
> Can you send me the r_1024_small_bg.failed and r_ext4_small_bg.failed
> files?
sure, although both those files are empty.. I've uploaded test logs (including
rhel5 failed one) here:

http://nik.lbox.cz/download/e2fsprogs-tests/

please let me know if I could provide more information

BR

nik



> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 						- Ted
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 00 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 591 166 214
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799

www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@...uxbox.cz
-------------------------------------

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped