[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130801084501.GA9419@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 01:45:01 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't re-try to remove the entry from es tree when
we encounter a ENOMEM in ext4_ext_truncate
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:42:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> The problem with truncate is that the VFS assumes truncate() will
> always succeed (the method function is returns a void, so there isn't
> even a way to propagate an error code back p to the VFS), so we really
> do need to do a retry in ext4's truncate code.
It hasn't for a long time. The ill suite truncate method is gone for
a long time, and setattr can return errors just fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists