linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Backports of jbd2 commits to jbd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51FAB226.3040405@windriver.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:08:22 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
CC:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Backports of jbd2 commits to jbd

On 13-08-01 03:01 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The following commits exist in jbd2, and the backport to jbd is
> relatively straightforward.  In doing so we make the debug enable
> interface consistent between jbd and jbd2.
> 
> For testing, I've booted up a machine with ext3 fs, done some basic
> operations (update a git tree, build a kernel) and also ensured that
> enabling debug via the new /sys/module/jbd/parameters/ entry works.
> Testing was on a baseline of v3.10-rc1-39-g741ddbc.

That should have been v3.11-rc3-40-g75eaff0; the above just happens
to be the 1st non-merge commit on mainline today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html