lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130801024800.GK7118@dastard> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:48:00 +1000 From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, bpm@....com, elder@...nel.org, hch@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, a.sangwan@...sung.com, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Implement FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:42:26PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com> > > New fallocate flag FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE implementation for Ext4 ..... > + > + punch_start = offset >> EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb); > + punch_stop = (offset + len) >> EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb); > + > + rounding = max_t(uint, 1 << EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb), PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); > + ioffset = offset & ~(rounding - 1); > + > + /* Write out all dirty pages */ > + ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, ioffset, -1); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* Take mutex lock */ > + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); > + > + truncate_pagecache_range(inode, ioffset, -1); Ted, that's invalidating the page cache from the start of the collaspse range to the end of the file. So the ext4 code is doing this bit correctly. Why isn't this in the XFS patches? Clearly the need for this was understood, and, well, this code is obviously copied from the XFS hole punching code. i.e. from xfs_free_file_space(). > + /* Wait for existing dio to complete */ > + ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio(inode); > + inode_dio_wait(inode); That should be done before invalidating the pagecache.... > + credits = ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode); > + handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, EXT4_HT_TRUNCATE, credits); > + if (IS_ERR(handle)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(handle); > + goto out_dio; > + } > + > + down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem); > + > + ext4_discard_preallocations(inode); > + > + ret = ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, punch_start, > + EXT_MAX_BLOCKS - punch_start - 1); > + if (ret) > + goto journal_stop; > + > + ret = ext4_ext_remove_space(inode, punch_start, punch_stop - 1); > + if (ret) > + goto journal_stop; So, this code punches out the existing space in the file so that the extent shifting is moving extents into a hole. Why is this in the ext4 code, but not the XFS code? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@...morbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists