lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2146168.3J7W6RtiZr@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 01:02:50 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: sedat.dilek@...il.com Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 [ call-trace on suspend: ext4 | pm related ? ] On Wednesday, August 07, 2013 04:25:14 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130806: > > > > The ext4 tree lost its build failure. > > > > The mvebu tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > > next-20130806. > > > > The akpm tree gained conflicts against the ext4 tree. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > [ CC ext4 and pm folks ] > > I saw this on my 1st suspend which was not successful (2nd and 3rd try > I could suspend and resume): > > [ 5467.724074] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. > [ 5467.973575] PM: Preparing system for mem sleep > [ 5467.974121] Freezing user space processes ... > [ 5487.970574] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.010 seconds (1 tasks > refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): > [ 5487.970591] DOM Worker D ffffffff81811820 0 2437 1 0x00000004 > [ 5487.970595] ffff880056ca3ca8 0000000000000002 00000000002d627f > 000009af00000002 > [ 5487.970598] ffff880066ede640 ffff880056ca3fd8 ffff880056ca3fd8 > ffff880056ca3fd8 > [ 5487.970601] ffff880119f98340 ffff880066ede640 ffff880056ca3ca8 > ffff88011fad5118 > [ 5487.970604] Call Trace: > [ 5487.970612] [<ffffffff81144360>] ? __lock_page+0x70/0x70 > [ 5487.970615] [<ffffffff816e8179>] schedule+0x29/0x70 > [ 5487.970618] [<ffffffff816e824f>] io_schedule+0x8f/0xd0 > [ 5487.970621] [<ffffffff8114436e>] sleep_on_page+0xe/0x20 > [ 5487.970624] [<ffffffff816e4be2>] __wait_on_bit+0x62/0x90 > [ 5487.970627] [<ffffffff81144f9b>] ? find_get_pages_tag+0xcb/0x170 > [ 5487.970630] [<ffffffff811444d0>] wait_on_page_bit+0x80/0x90 > [ 5487.970633] [<ffffffff8108a0e0>] ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x40/0x40 > [ 5487.970636] [<ffffffff811445ec>] filemap_fdatawait_range+0x10c/0x190 > [ 5487.970640] [<ffffffff81145ce0>] filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x50/0x80 > [ 5487.970644] [<ffffffff81246c3d>] ext4_sync_file+0x15d/0x340 > [ 5487.970648] [<ffffffff811db8dd>] do_fsync+0x5d/0x90 > [ 5487.970651] [<ffffffff811dbcc0>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20 > [ 5487.970655] [<ffffffff816f25ef>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6 > [ 5487.970658] > [ 5487.970659] Restarting tasks ... done. > > With yesterday's -next I did not have issues like this. It looks like ext4 was doing fsync, so it scheduled a write a waited for it to complete, but that never happened (most likely whoever was supposed to do the write had been already frozen then). Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists