[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1376471456-11966-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:10:54 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2 v2] Fix O_SYNC AIO DIO
Hello,
this is second iteration of patches to fix handling of O_SYNC AIO DIO.
Since previous version I've addressed Dave's comments:
- slightly expanded changelog of the first patch
- workqueue is now created with parameters allowing paralelism
- workqueue name contains sb->s_id
- workqueue is created on demand (I decided to do this to reduce the overhead
in unnecessary cases)
The patchset survives xfstests run for ext4 & xfs so it should be sane. Since
this touches several filesystems (although only ext4 & xfs are non-trivial),
the question is who should carry these patches. Maybe Al? But since xfs and
ext4 changes are non-trivial, I'd like to have a review from their
developers...
Honza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists