[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130817141227.GG30769@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:12:27 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: Fix lost truncate due to race with writeback
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:52:24PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> The following race can lead to a loss of i_disksize update from truncate
> thus resulting in a wrong inode size if the inode size isn't updated
> again before inode is reclaimed:
>
> ext4_setattr() mpage_map_and_submit_extent()
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = attr->ia_size;
> ... ...
> disksize = ((loff_t)mpd->first_page) << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
> /* False because i_size isn't
> * updated yet */
> if (disksize > i_size_read(inode))
> /* True, because i_disksize is
> * already truncated */
> if (disksize > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
> /* Overwrite i_disksize
> * update from truncate */
> ext4_update_i_disksize()
> i_size_write(inode, attr->ia_size);
>
> For other places updating i_disksize such race cannot happen because
> i_mutex prevents these races. Writeback is the only place where we do
> not hold i_mutex and we cannot grab it there because of lock ordering.
>
> We fix the race by doing both i_disksize and i_size update in truncate
> atomically under i_data_sem and in mpage_map_and_submit_extent() we move
> the check against i_size under i_data_sem as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Applied, thanks.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists