[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVayD1P2a8ShjZ2e4HYGwL_yE8FM7GnrWaL9MgXYMGvHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:33:22 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Rework mtime and ctime updates on mmaped writes
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Thu 22-08-13 17:03:16, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Writes via mmap currently update mtime and ctime in ->page_mkwrite.
>> This hurts both throughput and latency. In workloads that dirty a
>> large number of mmapped pages, ->page_mkwrite can be hot and
>> file_update_time is slow and scales poorly. Updating timestamps can
>> also sleep, which hurts latency for real-time workloads.
> It would help to make your case if you posted the latency comparison
> before & after the patchset in this introductory email. We can then see
> how significant is the reduction of latency...
Will do, although the data from my workload will be a little strange.
I was hoping that Dave Hansen would re-run his benchmark with these
patches applied. I tried to run it, but it wasn't obvious what the
numbers that spewed out meant.
--Andy
>
> Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists