[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGW2f1HsP1s+Avuiietg1BqqNeEJJ8g1MOgxHnx-8hqK57QG7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:45:06 -0400
From: jon ernst <jonernst07@...il.com>
To: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ext4_wait_block_bitmap() and ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() handle
bitmap verification differently
Hi,
I found that ext4_wait_block_bitmap() and
ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() handle bitmap verification
differently.
wait_block_bitmap() calls ext4_validate_block_bitmap() all the time.
But read_block_bitmap_nowait() checks EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT, if it
meets, it will skip ext4_validate_block_bitmap()
In my opinion, they'd better do same thing.
In that way, we can also return "fail" in ext4_valid_block_bitmap()
method when we meet FLEX_BG.
diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index dc5d572..366807a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struct
super_block *sb,
* or it has to also read the block group where the bitmaps
* are located to verify they are set.
*/
- return 0;
+ return 1;
}
group_first_block = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, block_group);
@@ -472,8 +472,12 @@ int ext4_wait_block_bitmap(struct super_block
*sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
return 1;
}
clear_buffer_new(bh);
- /* Panic or remount fs read-only if block bitmap is invalid */
- ext4_validate_block_bitmap(sb, desc, block_group, bh);
+
+ if (desc->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT)) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ /* Panic or remount fs read-only if block bitmap is invalid */
+ ext4_validate_block_bitmap(sb, desc, block_group, bh);
/* ...but check for error just in case errors=continue. */
return !buffer_verified(bh);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists