| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:01:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/31] badblocks: Use the new badblocks APIs for 64-bit
block numbers
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:28:44 -0700
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> To: tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com
> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 19/31] badblocks: Use the new badblocks APIs for 64-bit block
> numbers
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> ---
> misc/badblocks.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/misc/badblocks.c b/misc/badblocks.c
> index c9e47c7..660248e 100644
> --- a/misc/badblocks.c
> +++ b/misc/badblocks.c
> @@ -105,14 +105,14 @@ static void exclusive_usage(void)
> exit(1);
> }
>
> -static blk_t currently_testing = 0;
> -static blk_t num_blocks = 0;
> -static blk_t num_read_errors = 0;
> -static blk_t num_write_errors = 0;
> -static blk_t num_corruption_errors = 0;
> +static blk64_t currently_testing = 0;
> +static blk64_t num_blocks = 0;
> +static blk64_t num_read_errors = 0;
> +static blk64_t num_write_errors = 0;
> +static blk64_t num_corruption_errors = 0;
> static ext2_badblocks_list bb_list = NULL;
> static FILE *out;
> -static blk_t next_bad = 0;
> +static blk64_t next_bad = 0;
> static ext2_badblocks_iterate bb_iter = NULL;
>
> enum error_types { READ_ERROR, WRITE_ERROR, CORRUPTION_ERROR };
> @@ -144,17 +144,17 @@ static void *allocate_buffer(size_t size)
> * This routine reports a new bad block. If the bad block has already
> * been seen before, then it returns 0; otherwise it returns 1.
> */
> -static int bb_output (blk_t bad, enum error_types error_type)
> +static int bb_output(blk64_t bad, enum error_types error_type)
> {
> errcode_t errcode;
>
> - if (ext2fs_badblocks_list_test(bb_list, bad))
> + if (ext2fs_badblocks_list_test2(bb_list, bad))
> return 0;
>
> fprintf(out, "%lu\n", (unsigned long) bad);
> fflush(out);
>
> - errcode = ext2fs_badblocks_list_add (bb_list, bad);
> + errcode = ext2fs_badblocks_list_add2(bb_list, bad);
> if (errcode) {
> com_err (program_name, errcode, "adding to in-memory bad block list");
> exit (1);
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int bb_output (blk_t bad, enum error_types error_type)
> an element was just added before the current iteration
> position. This should not cause next_bad to change. */
> if (bb_iter && bad < next_bad)
> - ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate (bb_iter, &next_bad);
> + ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate2(bb_iter, &next_bad);
>
> if (error_type == READ_ERROR) {
> num_read_errors++;
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void print_status(void)
> gettimeofday(&time_end, 0);
> len = snprintf(line_buf, sizeof(line_buf),
> _("%6.2f%% done, %s elapsed. "
> - "(%d/%d/%d errors)"),
> + "(%llu/%llu/%llu errors)"),
> calc_percent((unsigned long) currently_testing,
> (unsigned long) num_blocks),
> time_diff_format(&time_end, &time_start, diff_buf),
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void pattern_fill(unsigned char *buffer, unsigned int pattern,
> * successfully sequentially read.
> */
> static int do_read (int dev, unsigned char * buffer, int try, int block_size,
> - blk_t current_block)
> + blk64_t current_block)
> {
> long got;
> struct timeval tv1, tv2;
> @@ -469,16 +469,16 @@ static void flush_bufs(void)
> com_err(program_name, retval, _("during ext2fs_sync_device"));
> }
>
> -static unsigned int test_ro (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> - int block_size, blk_t first_block,
> - unsigned int blocks_at_once)
> +static unsigned int test_ro(int dev, blk64_t last_block,
> + int block_size, blk64_t first_block,
> + unsigned int blocks_at_once)
> {
> unsigned char * blkbuf;
> int try;
So blocks_at_once can be unsigned int, but try is int. Later on we
store blocks_at_once in try which can cause problems.
> int got;
same here, even though do_read() returns int. However the actual
variable 'got' is long (and try is yet again int) it is really mess
;)
Thanks!
-Lukas
> unsigned int bb_count = 0;
> errcode_t errcode;
> - blk_t recover_block = ~0;
> + blk64_t recover_block = ~0;
>
> /* set up abend handler */
> capture_terminate(NULL);
> @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static unsigned int test_ro (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> exit (1);
> }
> do {
> - ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate (bb_iter, &next_bad);
> + ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate2(bb_iter, &next_bad);
> } while (next_bad && next_bad < first_block);
>
> if (t_flag) {
> @@ -532,7 +532,8 @@ static unsigned int test_ro (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> if (next_bad) {
> if (currently_testing == next_bad) {
> /* fprintf (out, "%lu\n", nextbad); */
> - ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate (bb_iter, &next_bad);
> + ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate2(bb_iter,
> + &next_bad);
> currently_testing++;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -581,16 +582,16 @@ static unsigned int test_ro (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> return bb_count;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int test_rw (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> - int block_size, blk_t first_block,
> - unsigned int blocks_at_once)
> +static unsigned int test_rw(int dev, blk64_t last_block,
> + int block_size, blk64_t first_block,
> + unsigned int blocks_at_once)
> {
> unsigned char *buffer, *read_buffer;
> const unsigned int patterns[] = {0xaa, 0x55, 0xff, 0x00};
> const unsigned int *pattern;
> int i, try, got, nr_pattern, pat_idx;
> unsigned int bb_count = 0;
> - blk_t recover_block = ~0;
> + blk64_t recover_block = ~0;
>
> /* set up abend handler */
> capture_terminate(NULL);
> @@ -716,13 +717,13 @@ static unsigned int test_rw (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> }
>
> struct saved_blk_record {
> - blk_t block;
> + blk64_t block;
> int num;
> };
>
> -static unsigned int test_nd (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> - int block_size, blk_t first_block,
> - unsigned int blocks_at_once)
> +static unsigned int test_nd(int dev, blk64_t last_block,
> + int block_size, blk64_t first_block,
> + unsigned int blocks_at_once)
> {
> unsigned char *blkbuf, *save_ptr, *test_ptr, *read_ptr;
> unsigned char *test_base, *save_base, *read_base;
> @@ -731,7 +732,7 @@ static unsigned int test_nd (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> const unsigned int *pattern;
> int nr_pattern, pat_idx;
> int got, used2, written;
> - blk_t save_currently_testing;
> + blk64_t save_currently_testing;
> struct saved_blk_record *test_record;
> /* This is static to prevent being clobbered by the longjmp */
> static int num_saved;
> @@ -740,7 +741,7 @@ static unsigned int test_nd (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> unsigned long buf_used;
> static unsigned int bb_count;
> unsigned int granularity = blocks_at_once;
> - blk_t recover_block = ~0U;
> + blk64_t recover_block = ~0ULL;
>
> bb_count = 0;
> errcode = ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate_begin(bb_list,&bb_iter);
> @@ -750,7 +751,7 @@ static unsigned int test_nd (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> exit (1);
> }
> do {
> - ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate (bb_iter, &next_bad);
> + ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate2(bb_iter, &next_bad);
> } while (next_bad && next_bad < first_block);
>
> blkbuf = allocate_buffer(3 * blocks_at_once * block_size);
> @@ -827,7 +828,8 @@ static unsigned int test_nd (int dev, blk_t last_block,
> if (next_bad) {
> if (currently_testing == next_bad) {
> /* fprintf (out, "%lu\n", nextbad); */
> - ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate (bb_iter, &next_bad);
> + ext2fs_badblocks_list_iterate2(bb_iter,
> + &next_bad);
> currently_testing++;
> goto check_for_more;
> }
> @@ -1042,8 +1044,8 @@ int main (int argc, char ** argv)
> int dev;
> errcode_t errcode;
> unsigned int pattern;
> - unsigned int (*test_func)(int, blk_t,
> - int, blk_t,
> + unsigned int (*test_func)(int, blk64_t,
> + int, blk64_t,
> unsigned int);
> int open_flag;
> long sysval;
> @@ -1262,14 +1264,14 @@ int main (int argc, char ** argv)
>
> if (in) {
> for(;;) {
> - switch(fscanf (in, "%u\n", &next_bad)) {
> + switch (fscanf(in, "%lluu\n", &next_bad)) {
> case 0:
> com_err (program_name, 0, "input file - bad format");
> exit (1);
> case EOF:
> break;
> default:
> - errcode = ext2fs_badblocks_list_add(bb_list,next_bad);
> + errcode = ext2fs_badblocks_list_add2(bb_list, next_bad);
> if (errcode) {
> com_err (program_name, errcode, _("while adding to in-memory bad block list"));
> exit (1);
> @@ -1295,8 +1297,10 @@ int main (int argc, char ** argv)
>
> if (v_flag)
> fprintf(stderr,
> - _("Pass completed, %u bad blocks found. (%d/%d/%d errors)\n"),
> - bb_count, num_read_errors, num_write_errors, num_corruption_errors);
> + _("Pass completed, %u bad blocks found. "
> + "(%llu/%llu/%llu errors)\n"),
> + bb_count, num_read_errors, num_write_errors,
> + num_corruption_errors);
>
> } while (passes_clean < num_passes);
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists