[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFszuVbYCGY=OR+EJrmh9Ta+jobuaRx8PfC9vE+V3ynDDS=yw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:22:34 +0800
From: Boxi Liu <boxi10liu@...il.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
Cc: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Robin Dong <sanbai@...bao.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
"lewis.liulei" <lewis.liulei@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: there is a BUG in disk full case in inlinedata feature.
hi,
I make the format patch about the inline_data patch .
Is there anything incomplete?
Thanks
boxi
2013/8/28 Tao Ma <tm@....ma>:
> Hi Boxi,
> Thanks for the detailed explanation and the bug fix. It looks good to me.
> So would you mind send out a formal patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Tao
> On 08/28/2013 01:09 AM, Boxi Liu wrote:
>> there is a BUG in EXT4 inlinedata feature when the disk is full(0B).
>> tast case:
>> step1: use the dd to make the disk full,has 0B remained.
>> step2: touch a inlinedata file
>> echo -n "123456" >> test.txt
>> step3: make the inlinedata file test.txt convert to extent block.
>> echo -n
>> "123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890">>test.txt
>> the step3 will write failed.and print the BUG Backtrace:
>> page:c1963bc0 count:-1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0
>> page flags:0x40000000()
>> Backtrace:
>> [<c004e180>] (dump_backtrace + 0x0/0x12c) from [<c07724ac>]
>> (dump_stack +0x18/0x1c)
>> r6:c0043a84 r5:c0bb688 r4:c1963bc0 r3:00000000
>> [<c0772494>] (dump_stack + 0x0/0x1c) from [<c00f6dd4>] (bad_page + 0xbc/0x13c)
>> [<c00fbd18>] (bad_page + 0x0/0x13c) from [<c00f74b80>]
>> (get_page_from_freelist + 0x4cc/0xb6c)
>> r7:c1963bd8 r6:c0043194 r5:c1963bc0 r4:00000001
>> [<c00f6fec>] (get_page_from_freelist +0x0/0xb6c) from [<c00f8148>]
>> (__alloc_pages_nodemask + 0x144/0x820)
>> [<c00f8004>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask +0x0/0x820) from [<c0115250>]
>> (handle_pte_fault + 0x574/0x758)
>> [<c0114cdc>] (handle_pte_fault + 0x0/0x758) from [<c0115500>]
>> (handle_mm_fault + 0xcc/0x110)
>> [<c0115434>] (handel_mm_fault + 0x0/0x110) from [<c00521a8>]
>> (do_page_fault + 0x16c/0x1f4)
>> [<c005203c>] (do_page_fault + 0x0/0x1f4) from [<c00440d0>]
>> (do_DataAbort + 0x40/0xac)
>> [<c0044090>] (do_DataAbort + 0x0/0xac) from [<c004a064>]
>> (ret_from_exception + 0x0/0x10)
>>
>> And when the system reboot , the step2 data "123456" will alse lost.
>> You can cat the test.txt,but there is no data in the file.
>> the reason is when the inlinedata convert to extent in the limit case,
>> the inlinedata read to the page,then destory the inlinedata,next step
>> is to __block_write_begin,but it can't get block,return -ENOSPC. so
>> the data lost.
>>
>> there is a patch may fix the bug:
>> in inline.c ext4_convert_inline_data_to_extent
>>
>> needed_blocks = ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode);
>>
>> + if(EXT4_C2B(sbi,percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter))
>> < needed_blocks)
>> + return -ENOSPC;
>> +
>> ret = ext4_get_inode_loc(inode, &iloc);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
Download attachment "0001-ext4-fix-an-ext4-inline_data-feature-file-bug.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (1220 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists