linux-ext4 - Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131028063905.GA9017@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:39:06 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc:	Stephen Elliott <techweb@...world.com>,
	David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>,
	Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4

[Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]

Hi Andreas,

If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].

1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html

Regards,
                                                - Zheng

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The error reported here is a relatively new one.  It only appeared in
> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn’t in the code that I’m using locally (1.42.7)
> so I wasn’t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
> 
> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I’m not
> sure exactly why.  From your comments, this can be reproduced with
> your database usage?  Does it use fallocate() or any other strange
> IO operations that might be causing this?
> 
> Have you tried updating your kernel?  If there is repeated corruption
> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
> in e2fsck.  Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@...world.com> wrote:
> 
> > Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a look over this.
> >  
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@...world.com] 
> > Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
> > To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@...ger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
> >  
> > Hi all,
> >  
> > I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
> >  
> > Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
> >  
> > Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro, I now see this issue.
> >  
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
> >  
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@...world.com] 
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
> > To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@...ger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >  
> > If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
> >  
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@...world.com] 
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
> > To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@...ger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >  
> > Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
> >  
> > You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months back.
> >  
> > The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this. No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
> >  
> > ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> >                 (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16) Clear? yes
> >  
> > Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176.  Fix? yes
> >  
> > Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> > Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> > Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> > Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences:  -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
> >  
> > Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> > Fix? yes
> >  
> > Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> > Fix? yes
> >  
> >  
> > /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> > /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 65923424/483393536 blocks
> >  
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
> 
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html