lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20131106151604.c2f85c3463e663cc27fd4eaf@linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:16:04 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, EXT4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbtree/test: test rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:37:23 -0800 Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > ... > > --- a/lib/rbtree_test.c > +++ b/lib/rbtree_test.c > @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ static int black_path_count(struct rb_node *rb) > return count; > } > > +static void check_postorder_foreach(int nr_nodes) > +{ > + struct test_node *cur, *n; > + int count = 0; > + rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(cur, n, &root, rb) > + count++; > + > + WARN_ON_ONCE(count != nr_nodes); > +} > + > static void check_postorder(int nr_nodes) > { > struct rb_node *rb; > @@ -148,6 +158,7 @@ static void check(int nr_nodes) > WARN_ON_ONCE(count < (1 << black_path_count(rb_last(&root))) - 1); > > check_postorder(nr_nodes); > + check_postorder_foreach(nr_nodes); > } > > static void check_augmented(int nr_nodes) I'm rather confused about where this fits with the other (and apparently withdrawn) patches. Please resend everything? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists