[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3F8D73A0-9449-42FB-8CFA-D1E4C86FF0B2@dubeyko.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:36:51 +0300
From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] hfsplus: use generic posix ACL infrastructure
On Dec 1, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> fs/hfsplus/acl.h | 9 +--
> fs/hfsplus/dir.c | 1 +
> fs/hfsplus/inode.c | 3 +-
> fs/hfsplus/posix_acl.c | 161 +++++-------------------------------------------
> fs/hfsplus/xattr.c | 5 +-
> fs/hfsplus/xattr.h | 2 -
> 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
The patch looks correct. I think only that it makes sense to add debug messages
in hfsplus_get_posix_acl() and hfsplus_set_posix_acl(). Previously, debug
messages were in hfsplus_xattr_get_posix_acl() and hfsplus_xattr_set_posix_acl()
but the patch removes these methods.
Thanks,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists