lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131204052758.GI20409@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:27:58 +0800 From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com> To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/28] tune2fs: add inline_data feature in tune2fs On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:03:00PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:55:36AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:29:46PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:11:47PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > > > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> > > > > > > > > Inline_data can be enabled without ext_attr. Hence we don't check it. > > > > As doing in mke2fs we need to check inode size. > > > > > > > > Now this feature only can be enabled because we may be out of space when > > > > disabling it. If this feature is disabled, we need to allocate a block > > > > for every file and directory, and it might exhaust all space. > > > > > > Could we at least try to turn off inlinedata and decline to clear the flag if > > > we ENOSPC? > > > > If we want to turn off inline_data, that means that we need to scan all > > used inodes and try to expand it. It isn't hard but I am wondering if > > someone really want to disable this feature. In my opinion, I really > > want to enable inline_data feature by default when we believe it is very > > stable because it will benefit for all desktop and Android users. > > I guess that really depends on our testers -- on the one hand, I do most of my > testing with scratch filesystems so on a practical level I will never need the > ability to "undo" these sorts of things. > > On the other hand, there's the argument that more people will test code if they > think they can go back to the old system if the new one turns out to be a mess. > > Same sort of reasoning applies to "why did you implement converting 64bit -> > 32bit filesystems?" :) Fair enough. You convince me. :) - Zheng > > --D > > > > - Zheng > > > > > > > > (Yes, that's more of a TODO feature request...) > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> > > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> > > > > --- > > > > misc/tune2fs.8.in | 5 +++++ > > > > misc/tune2fs.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/misc/tune2fs.8.in b/misc/tune2fs.8.in > > > > index 55c6dd9..78f965b 100644 > > > > --- a/misc/tune2fs.8.in > > > > +++ b/misc/tune2fs.8.in > > > > @@ -531,6 +531,11 @@ Setting the filesystem feature is equivalent to using the > > > > .B \-j > > > > option. > > > > .TP > > > > +.B inline_data > > > > +Allow data to be stored in the inode and extented attribute area. > > > > > > "extended" > > > > > > --D > > > > > > > +.B Tune2fs > > > > +only supports setting this filesystem feature. > > > > +.TP > > > > .B large_file > > > > Filesystem can contain files that are greater than 2GB. (Modern kernels > > > > set this feature automatically when a file > 2GB is created.) > > > > diff --git a/misc/tune2fs.c b/misc/tune2fs.c > > > > index 95c1886..1952081 100644 > > > > --- a/misc/tune2fs.c > > > > +++ b/misc/tune2fs.c > > > > @@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ static __u32 ok_features[3] = { > > > > EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE | > > > > EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS | > > > > EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG | > > > > - EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MMP, > > > > + EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MMP | > > > > + EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_INLINE_DATA, > > > > /* R/O compat */ > > > > EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE | > > > > EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_HUGE_FILE| > > > > @@ -1083,6 +1084,19 @@ mmp_error: > > > > disable_uninit_bg(fs, > > > > EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM); > > > > > > > > + if (FEATURE_ON(E2P_FEATURE_INCOMPAT, > > > > + EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_INLINE_DATA)) { > > > > + /* > > > > + * Check inode size. If inode size is 128, tell user that > > > > + * inline data is useless. > > > > + */ > > > > + if (EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super) == EXT2_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE) { > > > > + fputs(_("The inode size is too small to " > > > > + "store inline data.\n"), stderr); > > > > + return 1; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > if (FEATURE_ON(E2P_FEATURE_RO_INCOMPAT, > > > > EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA)) { > > > > /* > > > > -- > > > > 1.7.9.7 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists