[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131204203028.GT9535@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:30:28 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/28] libext2fs: support modifying arbitrary extended
attributes
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:53:43AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:54:57AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Ok, so inline_data implies ext_attr. I think we should change the test to
> > check for either feature flag, because with no test, we could accidentally
> > read/write EAs on a FS with ^ext_attr,^inline_data. Or maybe provide a helper
> > predicate to hide those details.
> >
> > Also, I'd ask you to send broken out changes to my patches... but I haven't
> > posted my monster patchset recently. :)
> >
> > (I think I might work up the courage to patchbomb the mailing list tonight.)
>
> Zheng's patchset includes some of your patches. Does it include all
> of them? If you are going to patchbomb the mailing list, do you have
> any suggestions for the best way for me to figure out which patches
> I should take from him and which from you?
It doesn't include all of them. At the moment there are 83 of them(!) which I
haven't figured out how to release in a reviewable manner. Roughly speaking,
the patches can be grouped:
1. The unapplied patches from the October submission (fuse2fs, 64bit
conversion, xattr editing part 1, metadata checksumming tests)
2. The xattr-editing patches
3. Fixes for uninit extent handling
4. Patches to test and turn on block_validity
5. A bunch of coverity fixes
6. Fixes for bugs I found by running xfstests atop fuse2fs
7. Fixes for that thing about block_uninit groups that Akira Fujita and I were
discussing
8. Fixes for 1k block filesystems with meta_bg
9. Patches to prevent too-high lblk mapping
I could collapse all the post-October fuse2fs and xattr-editing patches into
the original submissions, but that seems like it would be harder for people to
review the new changes.
As for resolving the inlinedata vs djwong-patchbomb sets, I'm trying to
maintain the situation that you should be able to apply them at any point after
applying the original xattr patch + group 2.
--D
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Ted
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists