lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131204203028.GT9535@birch.djwong.org> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:30:28 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/28] libext2fs: support modifying arbitrary extended attributes On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:53:43AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:54:57AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Ok, so inline_data implies ext_attr. I think we should change the test to > > check for either feature flag, because with no test, we could accidentally > > read/write EAs on a FS with ^ext_attr,^inline_data. Or maybe provide a helper > > predicate to hide those details. > > > > Also, I'd ask you to send broken out changes to my patches... but I haven't > > posted my monster patchset recently. :) > > > > (I think I might work up the courage to patchbomb the mailing list tonight.) > > Zheng's patchset includes some of your patches. Does it include all > of them? If you are going to patchbomb the mailing list, do you have > any suggestions for the best way for me to figure out which patches > I should take from him and which from you? It doesn't include all of them. At the moment there are 83 of them(!) which I haven't figured out how to release in a reviewable manner. Roughly speaking, the patches can be grouped: 1. The unapplied patches from the October submission (fuse2fs, 64bit conversion, xattr editing part 1, metadata checksumming tests) 2. The xattr-editing patches 3. Fixes for uninit extent handling 4. Patches to test and turn on block_validity 5. A bunch of coverity fixes 6. Fixes for bugs I found by running xfstests atop fuse2fs 7. Fixes for that thing about block_uninit groups that Akira Fujita and I were discussing 8. Fixes for 1k block filesystems with meta_bg 9. Patches to prevent too-high lblk mapping I could collapse all the post-October fuse2fs and xattr-editing patches into the original submissions, but that seems like it would be harder for people to review the new changes. As for resolving the inlinedata vs djwong-patchbomb sets, I'm trying to maintain the situation that you should be able to apply them at any point after applying the original xattr patch + group 2. --D > > Thanks, > > - Ted > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists