[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:41:37 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Fix deadlock when writing in ENOSPC conditions
On Thu 12-12-13 14:51:16, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:14:00AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Akira-san has been reporting rare deadlocks of his machine when running
> > xfstests test 269 on ext4 filesystem. The problem turned out to be in
> > ext4_da_reserve_metadata() and ext4_da_reserve_space() which called
> > ext4_should_retry_alloc() while holding i_data_sem. Since
> > ext4_should_retry_alloc() can force a transaction commit, this is a
> > lock ordering violation and leads to deadlocks.
> >
> > Fix the problem by just removing the retry loops. These functions should
> > just report ENOSPC to the caller (e.g. ext4_da_write_begin()) and that
> > function must take care of retrying after dropping all necessary locks.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
> Thanks for fixing this. The patch looks good to me. You can add:
> Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
>
> BTW, I have met a deadlock which is caused by ext4_da_reserve_space()
> in our product system. The calltrace information looks like this. So
> I want to make sure it is the root cause. But I couldn't reproduce the
> problem with running xfstest #269. Could you please tell me how to
> reproduce the deadlock?
I couldn't reproduce it either but Akira was able to reproduce it (but it
took him a long time as well).
> FWIW, I think we should backport this patch to stable kernel.
Agreed.
Honza
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/inode.c | 12 ------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > index 075763474118..61d49ff22c81 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> > @@ -1206,7 +1206,6 @@ static int ext4_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
> > */
> > static int ext4_da_reserve_metadata(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblock)
> > {
> > - int retries = 0;
> > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
> > struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
> > unsigned int md_needed;
> > @@ -1218,7 +1217,6 @@ static int ext4_da_reserve_metadata(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblock)
> > * in order to allocate nrblocks
> > * worse case is one extent per block
> > */
> > -repeat:
> > spin_lock(&ei->i_block_reservation_lock);
> > /*
> > * ext4_calc_metadata_amount() has side effects, which we have
> > @@ -1238,10 +1236,6 @@ repeat:
> > ei->i_da_metadata_calc_len = save_len;
> > ei->i_da_metadata_calc_last_lblock = save_last_lblock;
> > spin_unlock(&ei->i_block_reservation_lock);
> > - if (ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries)) {
> > - cond_resched();
> > - goto repeat;
> > - }
> > return -ENOSPC;
> > }
> > ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks += md_needed;
> > @@ -1255,7 +1249,6 @@ repeat:
> > */
> > static int ext4_da_reserve_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblock)
> > {
> > - int retries = 0;
> > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
> > struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
> > unsigned int md_needed;
> > @@ -1277,7 +1270,6 @@ static int ext4_da_reserve_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblock)
> > * in order to allocate nrblocks
> > * worse case is one extent per block
> > */
> > -repeat:
> > spin_lock(&ei->i_block_reservation_lock);
> > /*
> > * ext4_calc_metadata_amount() has side effects, which we have
> > @@ -1297,10 +1289,6 @@ repeat:
> > ei->i_da_metadata_calc_len = save_len;
> > ei->i_da_metadata_calc_last_lblock = save_last_lblock;
> > spin_unlock(&ei->i_block_reservation_lock);
> > - if (ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries)) {
> > - cond_resched();
> > - goto repeat;
> > - }
> > dquot_release_reservation_block(inode, EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1));
> > return -ENOSPC;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.8.1.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists