[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131213110608.GC14884@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:06:08 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
adilger@...ger.ca, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, mfasheh@...e.com,
xfs@....sgi.com, hch@...radead.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v3] fiemap: add EXTENT_DATA_COMPRESSED flag
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:24:43AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> I'd prefer to just see the new physical length field always filled
> out, regardless of whether it is a compressed extent or not. In
> terms of backwards compatibility to userspace, it makes no
> difference because the value of reserved/unused fields is undefined
> by the API. Yes, the implementation zeros them, but there's nothing
> in the documentation that says "reserved fields must be zero".
> Hence I think we should just set it for every extent.
>
> >From the point of view of the kernel API (fiemap_fill_next_extent),
> passing the physical extent size in the "len" parameter for normal
> extents, then passing 0 for the "physical length" makes absolutely
> no sense.
I tend to agree, but the additional complication here is that this is
a change to an existing API. We'd need another HAVE_PHYS_LEN flag for
non-compressed extents so that userspace can rely on it. Given that
it's only useful for that case I think the userspace API introduced
is the best we can get.
I think however that we should always pass the phys_len argument in the
kernel API just to make it less confusing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists