[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131223121703.GA4284@orion.maiolino.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:17:04 -0200
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ext4: ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink should
use cluster size
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0800, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
> From: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
>
> can be reproduced by xfstests 62 with bigalloc and 128bit size inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <yangyongqiang01@...du.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 9115f28..1869fcf 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int ext4_meta_trans_blocks(struct inode
> *inode, int lblocks,
> static int ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink(struct inode *inode)
> {
> int ea_blocks = EXT4_I(inode)->i_file_acl ?
> - (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize >> 9) : 0;
> + EXT4_CLUSTER_SIZE(inode->i_sb) >> 9 : 0;
Code looks good, but looks like it has an extra TAB here. Just a cosmetic thing;
despite that, consider it
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
--
Carlos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists