[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C6F944.4030605@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:54:12 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: "Huang Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@...bosch.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"Juergens Dirk (CM-AI/ECO2)" <Dirk.Juergens@...bosch.com>
Subject: Re: ext4 filesystem bad extent error review
On 1/3/14, 11:51 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:23:54AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> The BLKFLSBUF ioctl does __not__ send a CACHE FLUSH command to the
>>> hardware device. It forces all of the dirty buffers in memory to the
>>> storage device, and then it invalidates all the buffer cache, but it
>>> does not send a CACHE FLUSH command to the hardware. Hence, the
>>> hardware is free to write it to its on-disk cache, and not necessarily
>>> guarantee that the data is written to stable store. (For an example
>>> use case of BLKFLSBUF, we use it in e2fsck to drop the buffer cache
>>> for benchmarking purposes.)
>>
>> Are you sure? for a bdev w/ ext4 on it:
>>
>> BLKFLSBUF
>> fsync_bdev
>> sync_filesystem
>> sync_fs
>> ext4_sync_fs
>> blkdev_issue_flush
>
> This call chain only happens if the block device is mounted.
Sure, but I thought that's what they were doing. Maybe I misread.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists