[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106184619.GB2211@wallace>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:46:19 -0500
From: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@....edu
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix bigalloc regression
Commit f5a44db5d2 introduced a regression on filesystems created with
the bigalloc feature (cluster size > blocksize). It causes xfstests
generic/006 and /013 to fail with an unexpected JBD2 failure and
transaction abort that leaves the test file system in a read only state.
Other xfstests run on bigalloc file systems are likely to fail as well.
The cause is the accidental use of a cluster mask where a cluster
offset was needed in ext4_ext_map_blocks().
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 4410cc3..3384dc4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4218,7 +4218,7 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
*/
map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER;
newex.ee_block = cpu_to_le32(map->m_lblk);
- cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_CMASK(sbi, map->m_lblk);
+ cluster_offset = EXT4_LBLK_COFF(sbi, map->m_lblk);
/*
* If we are doing bigalloc, check to see if the extent returned
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists