linux-ext4 - Re: Dumpe2fs output with primary and backup superblock are different?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:35:34 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Subranshu Patel <spatel.ml@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dumpe2fs output with primary and backup superblock are different?

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:14:14PM +0530, Subranshu Patel wrote:
> I am using dumpe2fs command using primary superblock (default) and
> backup superblock. In both the cases the output is different.

Yes, this is expected.  It's too expensive to be constantly updating
all of the backup block group descriptors every time we allocate or
deallocate a block or inode.  What is important to be kept in the
backup block group descriptors is where to find the inode table and
allocation bitmaps.  E2fsck can reconstruct the information which is
not updated in the backup block group descriptors and backup
superblock, and that's what you are seeing which is different.

Regards,

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html