linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140123075356.GM13997@dastard>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:53:56 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 06:48:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:24:18PM -0500, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > This series of patches add support for XIP to ext4.  Unfortunately,
> > it turns out to be necessary to rewrite the existing XIP support code
> > first due to races that are unfixable in the current design.
> > 
> > Since v4 of this patchset, I've improved the documentation, fixed a
> > couple of warnings that a newer version of gcc emitted, and fixed a
> > bug where we would read/write the wrong address for I/Os that were not
> > aligned to PAGE_SIZE.
> > 
> > I've dropped the PMD fault patch from this set since there are some
> > places where we would need to split a PMD page and there's no way to do
> > that right now.  In its place, I've added a patch which attempts to add
> > support for unwritten extents.  I'm still in two minds about this; on the
> > one hand, it's clearly a win for reads and writes.  On the other hand,
> > it adds a lot of complexity, and it probably isn't a win for pagefaults.
> 
> FYI, this may just be pure coincidence, but shortly after the first
> boot of a machine with this patchset on 3.13 the root *ext3*
> filesystem started having problems.  It now gives persistent ENOSPC
> errors when there's 2.3GB of space free (on a 8GB partition), even
> though e2fsck says the filesystem is clean and error free.
> 
> Fmeh.
> 
> Update: I've just removed the patchset, rebuilt the kernel and the
> ENOSPC problem is still there. So it may be co-incidence, but given
> that it is persistent something is screwed got screwed up in the
> filesytem.

OK, false alarm - it is co-incidence. The damn root filesystem ran
out of inodes. Can you beleive that you're only allowed 600k inodes
in an 8GB filesystems? Sheesh! :)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html