[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140127235518.GB7020@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:55:18 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: high write latency bug in ext3 / jbd in 3.4
Hello,
On Mon 13-01-14 15:13:20, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> I've recently encountered a bug in ext3 where the occasional write is
> showing extremely high latency, on the order of 2.2 to 11 seconds compared
> to a more typical 200-300ms. This is happening on a 3.4.67 kernel. When
> this occurs, the system is writing to disk somewhere between 290-330MB/s.
> The test takes anywhere from 3 to 12 minutes into a run to trigger the
> high latency write. During one of these high latency writes, vmstat reports
> 0 blocks being written to disk. The disk array being written to is able to
> write quite a bit faster (about ~770MB/s).
>
> The setup is a bit complicated, but is completely reproducible. The
> workload consists of about 8 worker threads creating and then writing out
> spool files that are a little under 8MB in size. After each write, the file
> and the directory it is in are then fsync()d. The latency measured is from
> the beginning open() of a spool file until the final fsync() completes.
>
> Poking around the system with latencytop shows that sleep_on_buffer() is
> where all the latency is coming from, leading to log_wait_commit() showing
> the very high latency for the fsync()s. This leads me to believe that jbd
> is somehow not properly flushing a buffer being waited on in a timely
> fashion. Changing elevator in use has no effect.
I'm not sure if you haven't switched to ext4 as others have suggested in
this thread. If not:
1) Since the stall is so long, can you run
'echo w >/proc/sysrq-trigger'
when the stall happens and send the stack traces from kernel log?
2) Are you running with 'barrier' option?
> Does anyone have any ideas on where to look in ext3 or jbd for something
> that might be causing this behaviour? If I use ext4 to mount the ext3
> filesystem being tested, the problem goes away. Testing on newer kernels
> is not very easy to do (the system has other dependencyies on the 3.4
> kernel). Thoughts?
My suspicion is we are hanging on writing the 'commit' block of a
transaction. That issues a cache flush to the storage and that can take
quite a bit of time if we are unlucky.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists