[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zjmekgdh.fsf@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:32:58 +0400
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
To: lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org
CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...allels.com>
Subject: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Use generic FS in virtual environments challenges and solutions
Number of virtual environment/container solutions are grow rapidly, here is just
small list of well known names (qemu/kvm, VMware, openvz, LXC, etc)
There are two main challenges any VE solution should overcome:
1) Minimize Guest OS modification (ideally run unmodified binaries)
2) Resource sharing between several VE contexts (mem,cpu,disk)
There are plenty of advanced algorithms for CPU and memory sharing
between VEs. There are no many effective virtualization schemes for
disk at the moment.
OpenVZ project has interesting experience in fs/disk virtualization.
I want to propose three topics about fs/disk virtualization:
1) Effective space allocation scheme aka "Thin provision" [1]
Generic filesystem tries to spawn all it's data across whole disk.
In case of virtual images this result continuous VImage growth
during FS activity even if actual FS disk usage is low.
We have done some research and modified ext4 block allocator
which allow us to reduce VImage swelling effect, I would like to
discuss our finding's.
2) Space reclamation FS/disk shrinking
FS/disk growth is relatively simple operation most disk images and FS allow
online grow [2], but shrink is very heavyweight operation. I would like
to discuss some tricks how to make offline/online shrink less intrusive.
3) Filesystem error detection and correction
At this moment most filesystem may detect internal errors and perform
basic actions(panic,remount_ro) but this reaction is not suitable
for virtual environment because HardwareNode should continue to
operate and fix dedicated VE as soon as possible.
For this purpose it is reasonable to:
A) Implement fs event notification API similar to UEVENTs for devices or
quota event API. I would like to discuss this API.
B) Reduce fsck time. Theodore Tso have announced initiative to implement
ffck for ext4 [3]. I want to discuss perspectives of design and
implementation online fsck for ext4.
Footnotes:
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_provisioning
[2] http://openvz.org/Ploop
[3] http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=138661211607779&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists