lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:19:54 +0530 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Tuxera test suite failure for setfacl Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes: > Hello, > > On Wed 05-02-14 11:45:39, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> With commit c6ac12a6159c802ae8b757dd13563564e64333df we are modifying >> the ctime of the file when changing file's permission by setfacl. The >> commit says that is correct as per spec. But we do have a test in tuxera >> http://tuxera.com/sw/qa/pjd-fstest-20090130-RC.tgz test/xacl/00.t 45 >> which expect the ctime to be not changed across setfacl. >> >> I haven't looked at the spec myself. Can you double check and make sure >> it is ok to change the ctime across setfacl ? > Well, it would be really strange if changing permissions via chmod(1) > changed ctime but via setfacl(1) did not, don't you think? > That make sense. I guess we should consider this a test case error. -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists