[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140302071658.28217.78797.stgit@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 23:16:58 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/32] libext2fs: fix 64bit overflow in
ext2fs_block_alloc_stats_range
In ext2fs_block_alloc_stats_range(), the quantity "-inuse * n" is
calculated as a signed 32-bit quantity. Unfortunately, gcc (4.6.3 on
Ubuntu 12.04) doesn't sign-extend this quantity to fill the blk64_t
parameter that ext2fs_free_blocks_count_add() wants, so the end result
is that the superblock gets a ridiculously huge free block count.
Changing the declaration of 'n' to blk64_t seems to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
---
lib/ext2fs/alloc_stats.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/alloc_stats.c b/lib/ext2fs/alloc_stats.c
index 5bb86ef..4feb24d 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/alloc_stats.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/alloc_stats.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void ext2fs_block_alloc_stats_range(ext2_filsys fs, blk64_t blk,
while (num) {
int group = ext2fs_group_of_blk2(fs, blk);
blk64_t last_blk = ext2fs_group_last_block2(fs, group);
- blk_t n = num;
+ blk64_t n = num;
if (blk + num > last_blk)
n = last_blk - blk + 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists