linux-ext4 - [Bug 71641] Unreasonable performance degradation in ext4 with full data journaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bug-71641-13602-LKpUyiktDe@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2014 16:20:34 +0000
From:	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 71641] Unreasonable performance degradation in ext4 with full
 data journaling

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71641

--- Comment #1 from Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> ---
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:39:40AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> JFS provides three modes, journal, ordered and writeback.
> The first mode is denoted as ‘journal mode’in the following context.
> In the journal mode, data should be written twice, one for the journal area and
> the other for the client file system. If the journal area and the client file
> system are both located in the disk, it has at least 50% performance
> degradation compared to ordered mode.
> But what if we put the journal area in a ramdisk?

How big was the ramdisk?  Since all of the blocks are going through
the journal, even if it is on the journal, it requires more commits
and thus more checkpoint operations, which means more updates to the
disk.  A bigger journal will help minimize this issue.

Would you be willing to grab block traces for both the disk and the
external journal device?

I will add that the workload of "dd if=/dev/zero of=file" is probably
the worst case for data=journal, and if that's really what you are
doing, it's a case of "doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do that".  All
file systems modes will have strengths and weaknesses, and your use
case one where I would simply tell people, "don't use that mode".

If you want to work on improving it, that's great.  Gather data, and
if we can figure out an easy way to improve things, great.  But I'll
warn you ahead of time this is not necessarily something I view as
"unreasonable", nor is it something that I would consider a high
priority thing to fix.

                        - Ted

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html