[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140310133451.GA17807@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:34:51 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Matthew Rahtz <mrahtz@...itasystems.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: warning in ext4_journal_start_sb on filesystem freeze
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:04:42PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 6d7be3f..eea5ad1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ nfsd_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, struct iattr *iap,
> umode_t ftype = 0;
> __be32 err;
> int host_err;
> + bool get_write_count;
> int size_change = 0;
>
> if (iap->ia_valid & (ATTR_ATIME | ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_SIZE))
> @@ -411,10 +412,18 @@ nfsd_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, struct iattr *iap,
> if (iap->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE)
> ftype = S_IFREG;
>
> + /* Callers that do fh_verify should do the fh_want_write: */
> + get_write_count = !fhp->fh_dentry;
Eww, this is nasty. Given that there are only 6 callers of nfsd_setattr
in total, and only half of these might cause size changes I'd rather
deal with this properly, e.g. by taking both the fh_verify into the
callers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists