[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140316032756.GA31988@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 23:27:56 -0400
From: tytso@....edu
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v2] ext4: Update inode i_size after the preallocation
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:14:34PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Currently in ext4_fallocate we would update inode size, c_time and sync
> the file with every partial allocation which is entirely unnecessary. It
> is true that if the crash happens in the middle of truncate we might end
> up with unchanged i size, or c_time which I do not think is really a
> problem - it does not mean file system corruption in any way. Note that
> xfs is doing things the same way e.g. update all of the mentioned after
> the allocation is done.
>
> This commit moves all the updates after the allocation is done. In
> addition we also need to change m_time as not only inode has been change
> bot also data regions might have changed (unwritten extents). However
> m_time will be only updated when i_size changed.
>
> Also we do not need to be paranoid about changing the c_time only if the
> actual allocation have happened, we can change it even if we try to
> allocate only to find out that there are already block allocated. It's
> not really a big deal and it will save us some additional complexity.
>
> Also use ext4_debug, instead of ext4_warning in #ifdef EXT4FS_DEBUG
> section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists