[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-71641-13602-LfCF31tFUe@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:40:42 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 71641] Unreasonable performance degradation in ext4 with full
data journaling
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71641
--- Comment #8 from Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> ---
it's clear this isn't going to get performance up to 1.1 GB/s, but I'm curious
how much setting JBD2_NR_BATCH changes things at 512 and 1024 and possibly even
2048. Once it no longer maters a difference, if you could do another
blktrace, and also gather lock_stat information, that would be useful.
To gather lock_stat information, enable CONFIG_LOCK_STAT, and then "echo 0 >
/proc/lock_stat" before you start the workload, and then capture the output of
/proc/lock_stat after you finish running your workload/benchmark.
If you also regather numbers with lock_stat enabled on a stock 3.11 kernel (and
also get a /proc/lock_stat report from a stock 3.11 kernel, with and without
data=journal), that would be useful.
If it turns out that there is some lock contention going on with some of the
jbd2 spinlocks, there are some patches queued for 3.15 that I may have to ask
you to try (which will mean going to something like 3.14-rc7 plus some
additional patches from the ext4 git tree).
Thanks for your benchmarking!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists