linux-ext4 - Re: xfstest-bld generic/018 fails due to e4defrag issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGW2f1HpTEihjEaSk+bTxDBFhSuxxUpLq2wdzoo59xQHOPC+3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:10:47 -0400
From:	jon ernst <jonernst07@...il.com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfstest-bld generic/018 fails due to e4defrag issue

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:42:15AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>
>> From a quick visual inspection and a sparse bitwise check, e4defrag looks 64bit
>> clean.
>
> Thanks for checking!  I've applied Jon's patch.
>
>                                          - Ted
Thanks Ted, I have also checked e4defrag.c with eyeballs. All physical
blocks are represented by 64bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html