[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1404171051040.2143@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:53:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix ZERO_RANGE test failure in data journalling
mode
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:29:18 +0900
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
> Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix ZERO_RANGE test failure in data journalling
> mode
>
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>
> xfstests generic/091 is failing when mounting ext4 with data=journal.
> I think that this regression is same problem that occurred prior to collapse
> range issue. So ZERO RANGE also need to call ext4_force_commit as
> collapse range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index f386dd6..a64242f 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -4742,6 +4742,13 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
>
> trace_ext4_zero_range(inode, offset, len, mode);
>
> + /* Call ext4_force_commit to flush all data in case of data=journal. */
> + if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
> + ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
Hi,
it makes sense. But I have a question, maybe I do not understand it
correctly but what protect us from other writes coming in after we
force the commit ?
-Lukas
> +
> /*
> * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions
> * Then release them.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists