lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140417161249.GH18591@thunk.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:12:49 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Devrin Talen <dct23@...nell.edu>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4 filesystem corruption across partitions

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:05:23AM -0400, Devrin Talen wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm debugging an issue on my platform.  In short, I can corrupt an ext4
> filesystem on one partition by writing a file on a different one.  I'm
> suspecting something is off either with my partition table or filesystem
> parameters, but I'm such an ext4 beginner that I thought I'd start here
> to get some help in where to look.

The partition table looks fine.  (What I did was to take the lba_start
and partition_size fields from your table, imported them into a
spreadsheet, and then verified that "lba_start + partition_size/512"
for each partition was the same as the lba_start of the next
partition.  Obviously, there is no partition table overlap.)

The kernel is supposed to make sure that writes in one partition can't
affect another parition, so either you have a kernel bug in the block
device layer or driver, or you have a hardware problem.

I hate to ask this, but are you sure you have a quality 4GB sd card?
There are fraudulent cards out there where a card will be marked as
having X GB, but it only really has Y GB, or even Y MB worth of flash.
The people making these fraudulent cards rely on the fact that very
often people don't actually fill up their flash cards, so as long as
they don't write to more than Y GB worth of disk sectors, they won't
notice anything wrong.  But if you do write to more sectors than there
is flash, then the N+Ith unique disk sector write ends up going to the
Ith disk sector that had been written.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ