| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:30:26 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> To: tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Find the group descriptors on a 1k-block bigalloc,meta_bg filesystem On a filesystem with a 1k block size, the group descriptors live in block 2, not block 1. If the filesystem has bigalloc,meta_bg set, however, the calculation of the group descriptor table location does not take this into account and returns the wrong block number. Fix the calculation to return the correct value for this case. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> --- fs/ext4/super.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index f3c6670..ef78d13 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -2404,6 +2404,16 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t descriptor_loc(struct super_block *sb, if (ext4_bg_has_super(sb, bg)) has_super = 1; + /* + * If we have a meta_bg fs with 1k blocks, group 0's GDT is at + * block 2, not 1. If s_first_data_block == 0 (bigalloc is enabled + * on modern mke2fs or blksize > 1k on older mke2fs) then we must + * compensate. + */ + if (sb->s_blocksize == 1024 && nr == 0 && + le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_data_block) == 0) + has_super++; + return (has_super + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, bg)); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists