[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424014613.GU18672@dastard>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:46:13 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] ext4: extents status tree shrinker improvement
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:35:21PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:10:02AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:35:26AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > So I've been thinking about this some more, and it seems to me is
> > > actually, what we need is *both* an LRU and a RR scheme.
> >
> > We already have shrinker implementations that do this. It would
> > probably take 10-15 lines of code to add it to any existing LRU
> > list based shrinker.....
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I guess that you are talking about lru list in include/linux/list_lru.h.
> Thanks for pointing it out, and I will take a look at it.
No, I'm not - that's just the linked list implementation.
I'm talking about the use of referenced bits on the objects
themselves, and how the shrinker treats them. i.e. the I_REFERENCED
state bit in the inode, and DCACHE_REFERENCED on the dentry.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists