lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140513022543.GA28803@thunk.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 22:25:43 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2/2] ext4: Use EXT_MAX_BLOCKS in ext4_es_can_be_merged() On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:08:22PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > In ext4_es_can_be_merged() when checking whether we can merge two > extents we should use EXT_MAX_BLOCKS instead of defining it manually. > Also if it is really the case we should notify userspace because clearly > there is a bug in extent status tree implementation since this should > never happen. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> > Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> Applied, thanks. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists