| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:02:47 -0400 From: Chris Mason <clm@...com> To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, <dchinner@...hat.com> CC: <xfs@....sgi.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests On 05/14/2014 10:52 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/14/14, 8:20 AM, Lukáš Czerner wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate >> mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and >> even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks >> are definitely interested in the development process, but not >> everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the >> xfs@....sgi.com list. >> >> To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests >> patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder >> unfortunately. >> >> linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I >> think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. >> >> What do you think ? > > That sounds pretty reasonable to me. We've always encouraged submissions > to cc: the other relevant lists (i.e. linux-ext4 if it's an ext4-specific > patch) and would probably still encourage that, but even from the other > angle (keeping i.e. ext4-specific and btrfs-specific patches off the > xfs list) this sounds like a good idea. +1 here. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists