[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1405201150180.2162@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:56:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add sysfs entry showing whether the fs contains
errors
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:47:41 +0200
> From: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
> To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
> linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add sysfs entry showing whether the fs contains
> errors
>
> Hello Lukáš,
>
> just wanted to ask about the status of this patch.. it didn't make it
> to git yet, did it? Do you plan to make some changes to it? I'm eager
> to test it ;-)
No it did not and it would not given that there was not a merge
window since then. I've been distracted by other work, but I'll put
you in cc when I have a new patch - yes I plan to change the format
of the output to be more compliant with sysfs rules.
-Lukas
>
> cheers
>
> nik
>
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:44:34AM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 May 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 15:23:26 -0400
> > > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> > > To: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> > > Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
> > > nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add sysfs entry showing whether the fs contains
> > > errors
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:43:01AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Minor complaint: "contains" makes me think that cat'ing that file will return
> > > > either 0 or 1, not a string of error text. Perhaps we could shorten it to
> > > > /sys/fs/ext4/sda/errors ?
> > >
> > > What I'd suggest doing is simply calling it errors_count, and
> > > returning s_error_count. While we're at it, we could also return
> > > s_first_error_time and s_last_error_time as well, since I imagine
> > > those would could be quite useful for someone trying to create a
> > > system health monitoring daemon.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > - Ted
> >
> > Right now I am using the same function which prints this information
> > to the log. So I am going to use simpler output for the sysfs.
> >
> > <error count> <first time> <function>:<line> <last time> <function>:<line>
> >
> > That should be easy to parse. I think that just calling it errors is
> > good enough.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Lukas
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists