lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5384C18A.7040501@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:47:06 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: jbd2 batch time tuning behavior question Question for Ted: With this commit, you introduced some documentation and some code which are not consistent AFAICT: commit 30773840c19cea60dcef39545960d541b1ac1cf8 Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Date: Sat Jan 3 20:27:38 2009 -0500 ext4: add fsync batch tuning knobs <snip> + the transaction. The commit time is capped by + the max_batch_time, which defaults to 15000us + (15ms). This optimization can be turned off + entirely by setting max_batch_time to 0. <snip> + case Opt_max_batch_time: + if (match_int(&args[0], &option)) + return 0; + if (option < 0) + return 0; + if (option == 0) + option = EXT4_DEF_MAX_BATCH_TIME; + sbi->s_max_batch_time = option; + break; Docs say "0" turns it off, but option handling turns "0" into EXT4_DEF_MAX_BATCH_TIME. What was the real intent here; should the docs or the behavior be changed? Thanks, -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists