[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5386C5BF.7080202@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 00:29:35 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: more resize breakage
On 5/29/14, 12:27 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:22:37AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> After considering how many resize2fs corruptions we've had, I decided to try to write a resize fuzzer which picks random parameters and sizes, and sees what happens with online & offline grow & offline shrink. When I get it cleaner, I'll send it out to play with.
>>
>> But it is indeed finding resize issues; for example, with e2fsprogs git master & v3.15-rc3,
<snip>
>> Sad face. :(
>
> D'oh!
>
> /me wonders, is offline grow any better?
Yes, offline passed.
> Also I "extended" fsfuzz to corrupt only metadata blocks and made the
> kernel+e2fsck chew through all that crap. The kernel survived, but e2fsck
> seemed to die either failing to allocate blocks to resurrect the journal (bad
> bbitmap) or because of that thing where calling block_iterate on an inline data
> file makes e2fsck abort.
>
> So, uh, ... long live the patchbomb? :(
yeah. Maybe I (you?) should try my testcase w/ your latest patchbomb. ;)
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists