[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1406261827080.2172@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:28:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix punch hole on files with indirect mapping
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:24:50 -0400
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, stable@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix punch hole on files with indirect mapping
>
> I like the performance improvement of your patch, but I'm concerned
> that it might be a bit too complicated to push outside of the merge
> window.
>
> So what I propose doing is this. We'll take Jan's patches and after
> testing, we'll push it to Linus. Then for the the 3.17 merge window,
> after we've had more opportunity for testing and for other folks to
> review your changes, we can queue this patch (or its successor).
>
> Does that seem like a good path forward?
>
> - Ted
It does. But this is not exactly a critical bug and it has been
there since the introduction of punch hole for indirect file. But I
guess it's better to fix it sooner rather than later, so I am fine
with this.
Thanks!
-Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists