[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <001801cf9b3f$ad786ff0$08694fd0$@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:33:21 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
To: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: 'Dave Chinner' <david@...morbit.com>,
'Theodore Ts'o' <tytso@....edu>,
'linux-ext4' <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Luk?? Czerner' <lczerner@...hat.com>,
'Brian Foster' <bfoster@...hat.com>,
'Ashish Sangwan' <a.sangwan@...sung.com>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Add support IOC_MOV_DATA ioctl
>
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:59:49PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > This patch implements fs ioctl's IOC_MOV_DATA for XFS.
>
> Shouldn't this share code with the XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT implementation?
Lukas has raised the same question for ext4.
Both xfs(XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT) and ext4(EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) has ioctls which uses
almost similar kind of structure as struct mov_data.
As such, there seems to be possiblity for sharing basic code (I will try)
used for sanity checking in IOC_MOV_DATA to be shared with these ioctls
but the core functionality code will remain different.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists