linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix wrong size computation in ext4_mb_normalize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53BF5CD4.3030804@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:41:08 +0800
From:	Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
CC:	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <tytso@....edu>,
	<mlombard@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix wrong size computation in ext4_mb_normalize_request()

Hi,

On 07/10/2014 05:25 PM, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> 
>> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:40:36 +0800
>> From: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: tytso@....edu, mlombard@...hat.com,
>>     Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix wrong size computation in
>>     ext4_mb_normalize_request()
>>
>> As the member fe_len defined in struct ext4_free_extent is expressed as
>> number of clusters, the variable "size" computation is wrong, we need to
>> first translate it to block number, then to bytes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> index 7f72f50..9a543b5 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> @@ -3076,7 +3076,8 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
>>  		size = 8 * 1024 * 1024;
>>  	} else {
>>  		start_off = (loff_t)ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical << bsbits;
>> -		size	  = ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len << bsbits;
>> +		size	  = EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb),
>> +				     ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len) << bsbits;
> 
> There is a patch out there up for more discussion which rewrites a
> whole bunch of code in ext4_mb_normalize_request(). But more
> importantly this fix, while correct is not going to change anything
> since this condition will never be run.

Yeah, I have read your patch and related discussions, indeed this condition
would never be run, thanks for your explanation. But given that currently your
patch is not merged, still this code is wrong and should be fixed.
I'm new to ext4:) Whether should I continue to send a v2 version to fix this issue? thanks!

Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang
> 
> Btw, I take back the correct part since it seems that there is a
> a possibility of overflow. This should be better.
> 
> 		size	  = (loff_t)EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb),
> 					     ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len) << bsbits;
> 
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
> 
>>  	}
>>  	size = size >> bsbits;
>>  	start = start_off >> bsbits;
>>
> .
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html