| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: regression test for wrong assert in
ext4_mb_normalize_request()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:27:05 +0800
> From: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> To: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: lczerner@...hat.com, Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: regression test for wrong assert in
> ext4_mb_normalize_request()
>
> Regression test for:
> b5b6077 ext4: fix wrong assert in ext4_mb_normalize_request()
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> common/rc | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> tests/ext4/003 | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/ext4/003.out | 2 ++
> tests/ext4/group | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/ext4/003
> create mode 100644 tests/ext4/003.out
>
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 2c83340..018e569 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -1113,6 +1113,24 @@ _require_xfs_crc()
> umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> }
>
> +# this test requires the bigalloc feature to be available in mkfs.ext4
> +#
> +_require_ext4_mkfs_bigalloc()
> +{
> + _scratch_mkfs_ext4 -O bigalloc >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> + || _notrun "mkfs.ext4 doesn't have bigalloc feature"
> +}
> +
> +# this test requires the ext4 kernel support bigalloc feature
> +#
> +_require_ext4_bigalloc()
> +{
> + _scratch_mkfs_ext4 -O bigalloc >/dev/null 2>&1
> + _scratch_mount >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> + || _notrun "Ext4 kernel doesn't support bigalloc feature"
> + umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> +}
Even though we do not need the distinction here I can see that it
might be useful when testing mkfs alone, also I can see that xfs is
doing the same thing so I guess we can be consistent.
_scratch_mkfs_ext4 might fail due to incompatible mkfs
options being passed in with MKFS_OPTIONS. This can be resolved by
ignoring MKFS_OPTIONS if it fails the first time in
_scratch_mkfs_ext4() see _scratch_mkfs_xfs().
Also I feel that the same should be done with _scratch_mount because
again we can have incompatible mount options in MOUNT_OPTIONS, or
SCRATCH_OPTIONS. But that's a different issue entirely.
Thanks!
-Lukas
> +
> # this test requires the finobt feature to be available in mkfs.xfs
> #
> _require_xfs_mkfs_finobt()
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/003 b/tests/ext4/003
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..4ca282f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ext4/003
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. ext4/003
> +#
> +# Regression test for commit:
> +# b5b6077 ext4: fix wrong assert in ext4_mb_normalize_request()
> +# This testcase checks whether this bug has been fixed.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2014 Fujitsu. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + _scratch_unmount
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs ext4
> +_supported_os Linux
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_ext4_mkfs_bigalloc
> +_require_ext4_bigalloc
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +yes | mkfs.ext4 -O bigalloc -C 65536 -g 256 $SCRATCH_DEV 512m \
> + >> $seqres.full 2>&1
Here you should really be using
_scratch_mkfs_ext4
> +_scratch_mount || _fail "couldn't mount fs"
> +
> +dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile bs=1M count=256 2>&1 | _filter_dd
> +
> +echo "Slience is golden"
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/003.out b/tests/ext4/003.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..07f245d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/ext4/003.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 003
> +Slience is golden
> diff --git a/tests/ext4/group b/tests/ext4/group
> index 7e66035..152196c 100644
> --- a/tests/ext4/group
> +++ b/tests/ext4/group
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #
> 001 auto prealloc quick
> 002 auto quick prealloc
> +003 auto quick
> 271 auto rw quick
> 301 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress
> 302 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists