[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140724120801.GA26465@dastard>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 22:08:01 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: JP Abgrall <jpa@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Geremy Condra <gcondra@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Add support for FIDTRIM, a best-effort ioctl for
deep discard trim
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:47:18PM -0700, JP Abgrall wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> index ca1a11b..a1816ca 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
> #define FIFREEZE _IOWR('X', 119, int) /* Freeze */
> #define FITHAW _IOWR('X', 120, int) /* Thaw */
> #define FITRIM _IOWR('X', 121, struct fstrim_range) /* Trim */
> +#define FIDTRIM _IOWR('X', 122, struct fstrim_range) /* Deep discard trim */
The 'X' ioctl namespace is actually XFS's ioctl namespace. FIDTRIM
should be in the 'f' namespace - FIFREEZE and FITHAW were inherited
from XFS, which is where that came from originally, and it got
propagated to FITRIM and it wasn't caught on review. I only noticed
that now:
#define XFS_IOC_FSSETDM_BY_HANDLE _IOW ('X', 121, struct xfs_fsop_setdm_handlereq)
#define XFS_IOC_ATTRLIST_BY_HANDLE _IOW ('X', 122, struct xfs_fsop_attrlist_handlereq)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists