[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140728150026.GA17378@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:00:26 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Vlad Dobrotescu <vlad@...rotescu.ca>
Cc: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: errors=continue behaviour for failed external journal
device
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:31:05AM -0400, Vlad Dobrotescu wrote:
> If you are talking about changes, wouldn't "read-only" be a better fall-back
> alternative for a failed or missing external journal?
For a missing external journal, we simply wouldn't allow the mount to
succeed at all.
The discussion here was about what to do if we detect some kind of
inconsistency in a mounted file system.
Cheers,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists