[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CFFDA174.B4921%andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 01:07:10 +0000
From: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
To: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Bad flexbg_overhead calculation
I was running the "f_random_corruption" test during a build (patches
posted long ago), which formats filesystems with semi-random parameters,
and then
corrupts it and sees if e2fsck can fix it. In this case, it failed during
mke2fs, but without any obvious reason:
./misc/mke2fs -j -t ext4 -b 4096 -I 1024 -O
sparse_super,filetype,dir_index,resize_inode -F /tmp/tt 79106
mke2fs 1.42.11 (09-Jul-2014)
Creating regular file /tmp/tt
/tmp/tt: Invalid argument passed to ext2 library while setting up
superblock
It looks like this is caused by the following check in ext2fs_initialize():
flexbg_overhead = super->s_first_data_block + 1 +
fs->desc_blocks + super->s_reserved_gdt_blocks +
(__u64)flexbg_size * (2 + fs->inode_blocks_per_group);
/*
* Disallow creating ext4 which breaks flex_bg metadata layout
* obviously.
*/
if (flexbg_overhead > ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super)) {
retval = EXT2_ET_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
goto cleanup;
}
I suspect the reason it is failing is due to "-I 1024", which is creating
large inodes with extra xattr space, and this is confusing the flexbg
check, though I don't think this should be considered an invalid option?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists