[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140801013802.GS8628@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:38:02 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Pu Hou <houpu.hp@...baba-inc.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, boyu.mt@...bao.com,
wenqing.lz@...bao.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add inline data feature for symlink.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:58:52PM +0800, Pu Hou wrote:
> Symlink in debugfs can take advantage of inline data feature. The path name of the target of the symbol link which is longer than 60 byte and shorter than 132 byte can stay in inline data area.
I think Ted prefers wrapping commit messages at 70 bytes.
> Signed-off-by: Pu Hou <houpu.hp@...baba-inc.com>
> ---
> lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h | 3 +++
> lib/ext2fs/inline_data.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/ext2fs/symlink.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h b/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h
> index 7812956..8268d96 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h
> @@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ extern errcode_t ext2fs_inline_data_get(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino,
> extern errcode_t ext2fs_inline_data_set(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino,
> struct ext2_inode *inode,
> void *buf, size_t size);
> +extern errcode_t ext2fs_symlink_inline_data_set(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino,
> + struct ext2_inode *inode,
> + void *buf, size_t size);
>
> /* inode.c */
> extern errcode_t ext2fs_create_inode_cache(ext2_filsys fs,
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/inline_data.c b/lib/ext2fs/inline_data.c
> index 19248a0..ed82a32 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/inline_data.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/inline_data.c
> @@ -585,6 +585,32 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_inline_data_set(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino,
> return ext2fs_inline_data_ea_set(&data);
> }
>
> +errcode_t ext2fs_symlink_inline_data_set(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino,
> + struct ext2_inode *inode,
> + void *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct ext2_inode inode_buf;
> + struct ext2_inline_data data;
> + errcode_t retval;
> + size_t free_ea_size, existing_size, free_inode_size;
> +
> + if (!inode) {
> + retval = ext2fs_read_inode(fs, ino, &inode_buf);
> + if (retval)
> + return retval;
> + inode = &inode_buf;
> + }
> + memcpy((void *)inode->i_block, buf, EXT4_MIN_INLINE_DATA_SIZE);
> + retval = ext2fs_write_inode(fs, ino, inode);
> + if (retval)
> + return retval;
> + data.fs = fs;
> + data.ino = ino;
> + data.ea_size = size - EXT4_MIN_INLINE_DATA_SIZE;
> + data.ea_data = buf + EXT4_MIN_INLINE_DATA_SIZE;
> + return ext2fs_inline_data_ea_set(&data);
Doesn't ext2fs_inline_data_set() suffice?
> +}
> +
> #ifdef DEBUG
> #include "e2p/e2p.h"
>
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/symlink.c b/lib/ext2fs/symlink.c
> index ba8ed8e..a31912d 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/symlink.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/symlink.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>
> #include "ext2_fs.h"
> #include "ext2fs.h"
> +#include "ext2_ext_attr.h"
>
> errcode_t ext2fs_symlink(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t parent, ext2_ino_t ino,
> const char *name, char *target)
> @@ -36,6 +37,8 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_symlink(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t parent, ext2_ino_t ino,
> ext2_ino_t scratch_ino;
> blk64_t blk;
> int fastlink;
> + int inline_link = 0;
> + int max_inline;
> unsigned int target_len;
> char *block_buf = 0;
>
> @@ -53,12 +56,27 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_symlink(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t parent, ext2_ino_t ino,
> */
> fastlink = (target_len < sizeof(inode.i_block));
> if (!fastlink) {
> - retval = ext2fs_new_block2(fs, 0, 0, &blk);
> - if (retval)
> - goto cleanup;
> - retval = ext2fs_get_mem(fs->blocksize, &block_buf);
> - if (retval)
> - goto cleanup;
> + if (EXT2_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(fs->super,
> + EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_INLINE_DATA)) {
> + /* whether target string can be stored
> + in inline data area */
> + max_inline = EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super) -
> + sizeof(struct ext2_inode_large)-
> + sizeof(__u32)-
> + sizeof(struct ext2_ext_attr_entry)-
> + strlen("data")-
> + sizeof(__u32)+
> + EXT4_MIN_INLINE_DATA_SIZE;
> + inline_link = (target_len < max_inline);
Does ext2fs_xattr_inode_max_size() + EXT4_MIN_INLINE_DATA_SIZE return incorrect
results? I don't think we should have all xattr specific stuff belongs here in
the symlink routines.
> + }
> + if (!inline_link) {
> + retval = ext2fs_new_block2(fs, 0, 0, &blk);
> + if (retval)
> + goto cleanup;
> + retval = ext2fs_get_mem(fs->blocksize, &block_buf);
> + if (retval)
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -77,7 +95,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_symlink(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t parent, ext2_ino_t ino,
> memset(&inode, 0, sizeof(struct ext2_inode));
> inode.i_mode = LINUX_S_IFLNK | 0777;
> inode.i_uid = inode.i_gid = 0;
> - ext2fs_iblk_set(fs, &inode, fastlink ? 0 : 1);
> + ext2fs_iblk_set(fs, &inode, (fastlink || inline_link) ? 0 : 1);
> inode.i_links_count = 1;
> ext2fs_inode_size_set(fs, &inode, target_len);
> /* The time fields are set by ext2fs_write_new_inode() */
> @@ -85,6 +103,8 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_symlink(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t parent, ext2_ino_t ino,
> if (fastlink) {
> /* Fast symlinks, target stored in inode */
> strcpy((char *)&inode.i_block, target);
> + } else if (inline_link) {
> + inode.i_flags |= EXT4_INLINE_DATA_FL;
> } else {
> /* Slow symlinks, target stored in the first block */
> memset(block_buf, 0, fs->blocksize);
> @@ -109,14 +129,19 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_symlink(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t parent, ext2_ino_t ino,
> goto cleanup;
>
> if (!fastlink) {
> - retval = ext2fs_bmap2(fs, ino, &inode, NULL, BMAP_SET, 0, NULL,
> - &blk);
> - if (retval)
> - goto cleanup;
> + if (inline_link) {
> + retval = ext2fs_symlink_inline_data_set(fs, ino, 0,
> + target, target_len);
> + } else {
> + retval = ext2fs_bmap2(fs, ino, &inode, NULL,
> + BMAP_SET, 0, NULL, &blk);
> + if (retval)
> + goto cleanup;
>
> - retval = io_channel_write_blk64(fs->io, blk, 1, block_buf);
> - if (retval)
> - goto cleanup;
> + retval = io_channel_write_blk64(fs->io, blk, 1, block_buf);
> + if (retval)
> + goto cleanup;
Please fix the indentation inconsistency (tabs, not spaces).
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -139,7 +164,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_symlink(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t parent, ext2_ino_t ino,
> /*
> * Update accounting....
> */
> - if (!fastlink)
> + if ((!fastlink) && (!inline_link))
Probably unnecessary to put !fastlink and !inline_link in parentheses.
--D
> ext2fs_block_alloc_stats2(fs, blk, +1);
> ext2fs_inode_alloc_stats2(fs, ino, +1, 0);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists